Does anyone else find it interesting that the first sentence in a CNN article about the Plame fiasco ends with the phrase "two sources familiar with Armitage's role tell CNN"? By the way, while the article refers to two authors making money off the story ("The Armitage connection to the Novak column is also outlined in a new book titled "Hubris" by Michael Isikoff and David Korn."), those two writers are not the unnamed "sources familiar with Armitage's role."

I think we ought to put somebody in jail until we find out who those sources are.